And to dissolve a Parliament which is universally allowed to have been one of the best Parliaments that ever sat, which had acted liberally and respectfully towards the Sovereign, and which enjoyed in the highest degree the favour of the people, only in order to stop a grave, temperate, and constitutional inquiry into the personal integrity of the first judge in the kingdom, would have been a measure more scandalous and absurd than any of those which were the ruin of the House of Stuart.Such a measure, while it would have been as fatal to the Chancellor's honour as a conviction, would have endangered the very existence of the monarchy.The King, acting by the advice of Williams, very properly refused to engage in a dangerous struggle with his people, for the purpose of saving from legal condemnation a Minister whom it was impossible to save from dishonour.He advised Bacon to plead guilty, and promised to do all in his power to mitigate the punishment.Mr.Montagu is exceedingly angry with James on this account.But though we are, in general, very little inclined to admire that Prince's conduct, we really think that his advice was, under all the circumstances, the best advice that could have been given.
On the seventeenth of April the Houses reassembled, and the Lords resumed their inquiries into the abuses of the Court of Chancery.
On the twenty-second, Bacon addressed to the Peers a letter, which the Prince of Wales condescended to deliver.In this artful and pathetic composition, the Chancellor acknowledged his guilt in guarded and general terms, and, while acknowledging, endeavoured to palliate it.This, however, was not thought sufficient by his judges.They required a more particular confession, and sent him a copy of the charges.On the thirtieth, he delivered a paper in which he admitted, with few and unimportant reservations, the truth of the accusations brought against him, and threw himself entirely on the mercy of his peers."Upon advised consideration of the charges," said he, "descending into my own conscience, and calling my memory to account so far as I am able, I do plainly and ingenuously confess that I am guilty of corruption, and do renounce all defence."The Lords came to a resolution that the Chancellor's confession appeared to be full and ingenuous, and sent a committee to inquire of him whether it was really subscribed by himself.The deputies, among whom was Southampton, the common friend, many years before, of Bacon and Essex, performed their duty with great delicacy.Indeed, the agonies of such a mind and the degradation of such a name might well have softened the most obdurate natures."My Lords," said Bacon, "it is my act, my hand, my heart.I beseech your Lordships to be merciful to a broken reed."They withdrew; and he again retired to his chamber in the deepest dejection.The next day, the sergeant-at-arms and the usher of the House of Lords came to conduct him to Westminster Hall, where sentence was to be pronounced.But they found him so unwell that he could not leave his bed; and this excuse for his absence was readily accepted.In no quarter does there appear to have been the smallest desire to add to his humiliation.
The sentence was, however, severe--the more severe, no doubt, because the Lords knew that it would not be executed, and that they had an excellent opportunity of exhibiting, at small cost, the inflexibility of their justice, and their abhorrence of corruption.Bacon was condemned to pay a fine of forty thousand pounds, and to be imprisoned in the Tower during the King's pleasure.He was declared incapable of holding any office in the State or of sitting in Parliament: and he was banished for life from the verge of the court.In such misery and shame ended that long career of worldly wisdom and worldly prosperity.
Even at this pass Mr.Montagu does not desert his hero.He seems indeed to think that the attachment of an editor ought to be as devoted as that of Mr.Moore's lovers; and cannot conceive what biography was made for,"if 'tis not the same Through joy and through torment, through glory and shame."He assures us that Bacon was innocent, that he had the means of ****** a perfectly satisfactory defence, that when "he plainly and ingenuously confessed that he was guilty of corruption," and when he afterwards solemnly affirmed that his confession was "his act, his hand, his heart," he was telling a great lie, and that he refrained from bringing forward proofs of his innocence, because he durst not disobey the King and the favourite, who, for their own selfish objects, pressed him to plead guilty.
Now, in the first place, there is not the smallest reason to believe that, if James and Buckingham had thought that Bacon had a good defence, they would have prevented him from ****** it.
What conceivable motive had they for doing so? Mr.Montagu perpetually repeats that it was their interest to sacrifice Bacon.But he overlooks an obvious distinction.It was their interest to sacrifice Bacon on the supposition of his guilt; but not on the supposition of his innocence.James was very properly unwilling to run the risk of protecting his Chancellor against the Parliament.But if the Chancellor had been able, by force of argument, to obtain an acquittal from the Parliament, we have no doubt that both the King and Villiers would have heartily rejoiced.They would have rejoiced, not merely on account of their friendship for Bacon, which seems, however, to have been as sincere as most friendships of that sort, but on selfish grounds.
Nothing could have strengthened the Government more than such a victory.The King and the favourite abandoned the Chancellor because they were unable to avert his disgrace, and unwilling to share it.Mr.Montagu mistakes effect for cause.He thinks that Bacon did not prove his innocence, because he was not supported by the Court.The truth evidently is that the Court did not venture to support Bacon, because he could not prove his innocence.
