They placed themselves at the head of the Protestants of Europe, and staked all their fame and fortunes on the success of their party.
It is needless to relate how dexterously, how resolutely, how gloriously they directed the politics of England during the eventful years which followed, how they succeeded in uniting their friends and separating their enemies, how they humbled the pride of Philip, how they backed the unconquerable spirit of Coligny, how they rescued Holland from tyranny, how they founded the maritime greatness of their country, how they outwitted the artful politicians of Italy, and tamed the ferocious chieftains of Scotland.It is impossible to deny that they committed many acts which would justly bring on a statesman of our time censures of the most serious kind.But, when we consider the state of morality in their age, and the unscrupulous character of the adversaries against whom they had to contend, we are forced to admit that it is not without reason that their names are still held in veneration by their countrymen.
There were, doubtless, many diversities in their intellectual and moral character.But there was a strong family likeness.The constitution of their minds was remarkably sound.No particular faculty was pre-eminently developed; but manly health and vigour were equally diffused through the whole.They were men of letters.Their minds were by nature and by exercise well fashioned for speculative pursuits.It was by circumstances, rather than by any strong bias of inclination, that they were led to take a prominent part in active life.In active life, however, no men could be more perfectly free from the faults of mere theorists and pedants.No men observed more accurately the signs of the times.No men had a greater practical acquaintance with human nature.Their policy was generally characterised rather by vigilance, by moderation, and by firmness, than by invention, or by the spirit of enterprise.
They spoke and wrote in a manner worthy of their excellent sense.
Their eloquence was less copious and less ingenious, but far purer and more manly than that of the succeeding generation.It was the eloquence of men who had lived with the first translators of the Bible, and with the authors of the Book of Common Prayer.
It was luminous, dignified, solid, and very slightly tainted with that affectation which deformed the style of the ablest men of the next age.If, as sometimes chanced, these politicians were under the necessity of taking a part in the theological controversies on which the dearest interests of kingdoms were then staked, they acquitted themselves as if their whole lives had been passed in the Schools and the Convocation.
There was something in the temper of these celebrated men which secured them against the proverbial inconstancy both of the Court and of the multitude.No intrigue, no combination of rivals, could deprive them of the confidence of their Sovereign.No parliament attacked their influence.No mob coupled their names with any odious grievance.Their power ended only with their lives.In this respect, their fate presents a most remarkable contrast to that of the enterprising and brilliant politicians of the preceding and of the succeeding generation.Burleigh was Minister during forty years.Sir Nicholas Bacon held the great seal more than twenty years.Sir Walter Mildmay was Chancellor of the Exchequer twenty-three years.Sir Thomas Smith was Secretary of State eighteen years; Sir Francis Walsingham about as long.They all died in office, and in the enjoyment of public respect and royal favour.Far different had been the fate of Wolsey, Cromwell, Norfolk, Somerset, and Northumberland.Far different also was the fate of Essex, of Raleigh, and of the still more illustrious man whose life we propose to consider.
The explanation of this circumstance is perhaps contained in the motto which Sir Nicholas Bacon inscribed over the entrance of his hall at Gorhambury, Mediocria firma.This maxim was constantly borne in mind by himself and his colleagues.They were more solicitous to lay the foundations of their power deep than to raise the structure to a conspicuous but insecure height.None of them aspired to be sole Minister.None of them provoked envy by an ostentatious display of wealth and influence.None of them affected to outshine the ancient aristocracy of the kingdom.They were free from that childish love of titles which characterised the successful courtiers of the generation which preceded them and of that which followed them.Only one of those whom we have named was made a peer; and he was content with the lowest degree of the peerage.As to money, none of them could, in that age, justly be considered as rapacious.Some of them would, even in our time, deserve the praise of eminent disinterestedness.Their fidelity to the State was incorruptible.Their private morals were without stain.Their households were sober and well governed.
Among these statesmen Sir Nicholas Bacon was generally considered as ranking next to Burleigh.He was called by Camden "Sacris conciliis alterum columen"; and by George Buchanan,"diu Britannici Regni secundum columen."The second wife of Sir Nicholas and mother of Francis Bacon was Anne, one of the daughters of Sir Anthony Cooke, a man of distinguished learning who had been tutor to Edward the Sixth.
