If he was fond of money, some prank was invented to make him disburse more than he could spare.If he was hypochondriacal, he was made to believe that he had the dropsy.If he had particularly set his heart on visiting a place, a letter was forged to frighten him from going thither.These things, it may be said, are trifles.They are so; but they are indications, not to be mistaken, of a nature to which the sight of human suffering and human degradation is an agreeable excitement.
Frederic had a keen eye for the foibles of others, and loved to communicate his discoveries.He had some talent for sarca**, and considerable skill in detecting the sore places where sarca** would be most acutely felt.His vanity, as well as his malignity, found gratification in the vexation and confusion of those who smarted under his caustic jests.Yet in truth his success on these occasions belonged quite as much to the king as to the wit.
We read that Commodus descended, sword in hand, into the arena, against a wretched gladiator, armed only with a foil of lead, and, after shedding the blood of the helpless victim, struck medals to commemorate the inglorious victory.The triumphs of Frederic in the war of repartee were of much the same kind.How to deal with him was the most puzzling of questions.To appear constrained in his presence was to disobey his commands, and to spoil his amusement.Yet if his associates were enticed by his graciousness to indulge in the familiarity of a cordial intimacy, he was certain to make them repent of their presumption by some cruel humiliation.To resent his affronts was perilous;yet not to resent them was to deserve and to invite them.In his view, those who mutinied were insolent and ungrateful; those who submitted were curs made to receive bones and kickings with the same fawning patience.It is, indeed, difficult to conceive how anything short of the rage of hunger should have induced men to bear the misery of being the associates of the Great King.It was no lucrative post.His Majesty was as severe and economical in his friendships as in the other charges of his establishment, and as unlikely to give a rixdollar too much for his guests as for his dinners.The sum which he allowed to a poet or a philosopher was the very smallest sum for which such poet or philosopher could be induced to sell himself into slavery; and the bondsman might think himself fortunate, if what had been so grudgingly given was not, after years of suffering, rudely and arbitrarily withdrawn.
Potsdam was, in truth, what it was called by one of its most illustrious inmates, the Palace of Alcina, At the first glance it seemed to be a delightful spot, where every intellectual and physical enjoyment awaited the happy adventurer.Every newcomer was received with eager hospitality, intoxicated with flattery, encouraged to expect prosperity and greatness.It was in vain that a long succession of favourites who had entered that abode with delight and hope, and who, after a short term of delusive happiness, had been doomed to expiate their folly by years of wretchedness and degradation, raised their voices to warn the aspirant who approached the charmed threshold.Some had wisdom enough to discover the truth early, and spirit enough to fly without looking back; others lingered on to a cheerless and unhonoured old age.We have no hesitation in saying that the poorest author of that time in London, sleeping on a bulk, dining in a cellar, with a cravat of paper, and a skewer for a shirt-pin, was a happier man than any of the literary inmates of Frederic's Court.
But of all who entered the enchanted garden in the inebriation of delight, and quitted it in agonies of rage and shame, the most remarkable was Voltaire.Many circumstances had made him desirous of finding a home at a distance from his country.His fame had raised him up enemies.His sensibility gave them a formidable advantage over him.They were, indeed, contemptible assailants.
Of all that they wrote against him, nothing has survived except what he has himself preserved.But the constitution of his mind resembled the constitution of those bodies in which the slightest scratch of a bramble, or the bite of a gnat, never fails to fester.Though his reputation was rather raised than lowered by the abuse of such writers as Freron and Desfontaines, though the vengeance which he took on Freron and Desfontaines was such, that scourging, branding, pillorying, would have been a trifle to it, there is reason to believe that they gave him far more pain than he ever gave them.Though he enjoyed during his own lifetime the reputation of a classic, though he was extolled by his contemporaries above all poets, philosophers, and historians, though his works were read with as much delight and admiration at Moscow and Westminster, at Florence and Stockholm, as at Paris itself, he was yet tormented by that restless jealousy which should seem to belong only to minds burning with the desire of fame, and yet conscious of impotence.To men of letters who could by no possibility be his rivals, he was, if they behaved well to him, not merely just, not merely courteous, but often a hearty friend and a munificent benefactor.But to every writer who rose to a celebrity approaching his own, he became either a disguised or an avowed enemy.He slily depreciated Montesquieu and Buffon.
