Johnson came among them the solitary specimen of a past age, the last survivor of the genuine race of Grub Street hacks; the last of that generation of authors whose abject misery and whose dissolute manners had furnished inexhaustible matter to the satirical genius of Pope.From nature he had received an uncouth figure, a diseased constitution, and an irritable temper.The manner in which the earlier years of his manhood had been passed had given to his demeanour, and even to his moral character, some peculiarities appalling to the civilised beings who were the companions of his old age.The perverse irregularity of his hours, the slovenliness of his person, his fits of strenuous exertion, interrupted by long intervals of sluggishness, his strange abstinence, and his equally strange voracity, his active benevolence, contrasted with the constant rudeness and the occasional ferocity of his manners in society, made him, in the opinion of those with whom he lived during the last twenty years of his life, a complete original.An original he was, undoubtedly, in some respects.But if we possessed full information concerning those who shared his early hardships, we should probably find that what we call his singularities of manner were, for the most part, failings which he had in common with the class to which he belonged.He ate at Streatham Park as he had been used to eat behind the screen at St.John's Gate, when he was ashamed to show his ragged clothes.He ate as it was natural that a man should eat, who, during a great part of his life, had passed the morning in doubt whether he should have food for the afternoon.The habits of his early life had accustomed him to bear privation with fortitude, but not to taste pleasure with moderation.He could fast; but, when he did not fast, he tore his dinner like a famished wolf, with the veins swelling on his forehead, and the perspiration running down his cheeks.He scarcely ever took wine.But when he drank it, he drank it greedily and in large tumblers.These were, in fact, mitigated symptoms of that same moral disease which raged with such deadly malignity in his friends Savage and Boyse.The roughness and violence which he showed in society were to be expected from a man whose temper, not naturally gentle, had been long tried by the bitterest calamities, by the want of meat, of fire, and of clothes, by the importunity of creditors, by the insolence of booksellers, by the derision of fools, by the insincerity of patrons, by that bread which is the bitterest of all food, by those stairs which are the most toilsome of all paths, by that deferred hope which makes the heart sick.Through all these things the ill-dressed, coarse, ungainly pedant had struggled manfully up to eminence and command.It was natural that, in the exercise of his power, he should be "eo immitior, quia toleraverat," that, though his heart was undoubtedly generous and humane, his demeanour in society should be harsh and despotic.
For severe distress he had sympathy, and not only sympathy, but munificent relief.But for the suffering which a harsh word inflicts upon a delicate mind he had no pity; for it was a kind of suffering which he could scarcely conceive.He would carry home on his shoulders a sick and starving girl from the streets.
He turned his house into a place of refuge for a crowd of wretched old creatures who could find no other asylum; nor could all their peevishness and ingratitude weary out his benevolence.
But the pangs of wounded vanity seemed to him ridiculous: and he scarcely felt sufficient compassion even for the pangs of wounded affection.He had seen and felt so much of sharp misery, that he was not affected by paltry vexations; and he seemed to think that everybody ought to be as much hardened to those vexations as himself.He was angry with Boswell for complaining of a headache, with Mrs.Thrale for grumbling about the dust on the road, or the smell of the kitchen.These were, in his phrase, "foppish lamentations," which people ought to be ashamed to utter in a world so full of sin and sorrow.Goldsmith crying because The Good-natured Man had failed, inspired him with no pity.Though his own health was not good, he detested and despised valetudinarians.Pecuniary losses, unless they reduced the loser absolutely to beggary, moved him very little.People whose hearts had been softened by prosperity might weep, he said, for such events; but all that could be expected of a plain man was not to laugh.He was not much moved even by the spectacle of Lady Tavistock dying of a broken heart for the loss of her lord.Such grief he considered as a luxury reserved for the idle and the wealthy.A washerwoman, left a widow with nine small children, would not have sobbed herself to death.
A person who troubled himself so little about small or sentimental grievances was not likely to be very attentive to the feelings of others in the ordinary intercourse of society.He could not understand how a sarca** or a reprimand could make any man really unhappy."My dear doctor," said he to Goldsmith, "what harm does it do to a man to call him Holofernes?" "Pooh, ma'am,"he exclaimed, to Mrs.Carter, "who is the worse for being talked of uncharitably?" Politeness has been well defined as benevolence in small things.Johnson was impolite, not because he wanted benevolence, but because small things appeared smaller to him than to people who had never known what it was to live for fourpence halfpenny a day.
