All the stages of the journey, all the forms which cross or overtake the pilgrims, giants, and hobgoblins, ill-favoured ones, and shining ones, the tall, comely, swarthy Madam Bubble, with her great purse by her side, and her fingers playing with the money, the black man in the bright vesture, Mr.Wordly-Wise-man and my Lord Hategood, Mr.Talkative, and Mrs.Timorous, all are actually existing beings to us.We follow the travellers through their allegorical progress with interest not inferior to that with which we follow Elizabeth from Siberia to Moscow, or Jeanie Deans from Edinburgh to London.Bunyan is almost the only writer who ever gave to the abstract the interest of the concrete.In the works of many celebrated authors, men are mere personifications.We have not a jealous man, but jealousy; not a traitor, but perfidy; not a patriot, but patriotism.The mind of Bunyan, on the contrary, was so imaginative that personifications, when he dealt with them, became men.A dialogue between two qualities, in his dream, has more dramatic effect than a dialogue between two human beings in most plays.In this respect the genius of Bunyan bore a great resemblance to that of a man who had very little else in common with him, Percy Bysshe Shelley.The strong imagination of Shelley made him an idolater in his own despite.Out of the most indefinite terms of a hard, cold, dark, metaphysical system, he made a gorgeous Pantheon, full of beautiful, majestic, and life-like forms.He turned atheism itself into a mythology, rich with visions as glorious as the gods that live in the marble of Phidias, or the virgin saints that smile on us from the canvas of Murillo.The Spirit of Beauty, the Principle of Good, the Principle of Evil, when he treated of them, ceased to be abstractions.They took shape and colour.They were no longer mere words; but intelligible forms, fair humanities, objects of love, of adoration, or of fear.As there can be no stronger sign of a mind destitute of the poetical faculty than that tendency which was so common among the writers of the French school to turn images into abstractions, Venus for example, into Love, Minerva into Wisdom, Mars into War, and Bacchus into Festivity, so there can be no stronger sign of a mind truly poetical than a disposition to reverse this abstracting process, and to make individuals out of generalities.Some of the metaphysical and ethical theories of Shelley were certainly most absurd and pernicious.But we doubt whether any modern poet has possessed in an equal degree some of the highest qualities of the great ancient masters.The words bard and inspiration, which seem so cold and affected when applied to other modern writers, have a perfect propriety when applied to him.He was not an author, but a bard.His poetry seems not to have been an art, but an inspiration.Had he lived to the full age of man, he might not improbably have given to the world some great work of the very highest rank in design and execution.But, alas!
O daphnis eba roon' ekluse dina ton Mosais philon andra, ton ou Numphaisin apekhthi.
But we must return to Bunyan.The Pilgrim's Progress undoubtedly is not a perfect allegory.The types are often inconsistent with each other; and sometimes the allegorical disguise is altogether thrown off.The river, for example, is emblematic of death; and we are told that every human being must pass through the river.
But Faithful does not pass through it.He is martyred, not in shadow, but in reality, at Vanity Fair.Hopeful talks to Christian about Esau's birthright and about his own convictions of sin as Bunyan might have talked with one of his own congregation.The damsels at the House Beautiful catechise Christiana's boys, as any good ladies might catechise any boys at a Sunday School.But we do not believe that any man, whatever might be his genius, and whatever his good luck, could long continue a figurative history without falling into many inconsistencies.We are sure that inconsistencies, scarcely less gross than the worst into which Bunyan has fallen, may be found in the shortest and most elaborate allegories of the Spectator and the Rambler.The Tale of a Tub and the History of John Bull swarm with similar errors, if the name of error can be properly applied to that which is unavoidable.It is not easy to make a simile go on all-fours.But we believe that no human ingenuity could produce such a centipede as a long allegory in which the correspondence between the outward sign and the thing signified should be exactly preserved.Certainly no writer, ancient or modern, has yet achieved the adventure.The best thing, on the whole, that an allegorist can do, is to present to his readers a succession of analogies, each of which may separately be striking and happy, without looking very nicely to see whether they harmonise with each other.This Bunyan has done; and, though a minute scrutiny may detect inconsistencies in every page of his tale, the general effect which the tale produces on all persons, learned and unlearned, proves that he has done well.The passages which it is most difficult to defend are those in which he altogether drops the allegory, and puts into the mouth of his pilgrims religious ejaculations and disquisitions better suited to his own pulpit at Bedford or Reading than to the Enchanted Ground or to the Interpreter's Garden.Yet even these passages, though we will not undertake to defend them against the objections of critics, we feel that we could ill spare.We feel that the story owes much of its charm to these occasional glimpses of solemn and affecting subjects, which will not be hidden, which force themselves through the veil, and appear before us in their native aspect.The effect is not unlike that which is said to have been produced on the ancient stage, when the eyes of the actor were seen flaming through his mask, and giving life and expression to what would else have been an inanimate and uninteresting disguise.
