His prospects were greatly overcast by this event.He was most desirous to obtain a provision which might enable him to devote himself to literature and politics.He applied to the Government; and it seems strange that he should have applied in vain.His wishes were moderate.His hereditary claims on the administration were great.He had himself been favourably noticed by the Queen.His uncle was Prime Minister.His own talents were such as any Minister might have been eager to enlist in the public service.But his solicitations were unsuccessful.The truth is that the Cecils disliked him, and did all that they could decently do to keep him down.It has never been alleged that Bacon had done anything to merit this dislike; nor is it at all probable that a man whose temper was naturally mild, whose manners were courteous, who, through life, nursed his fortunes with the utmost care, and who was fearful even to a fault of offending the powerful, would have given any just cause of displeasure to a kinsman who had the means of rendering him essential service and of doing him irreparable injury.The real explanation, we believe, is this.Robert Cecil, the Treasurer's second son, was younger by a few months than Bacon.He had been educated with the utmost care, had been initiated, while still a boy, in the mysteries of diplomacy and court-intrigue, and was just at this time about to be produced on the stage of public life.The wish nearest to Burleigh's heart was that his own greatness might descend to this favourite child.But even Burleigh's fatherly partiality could hardly prevent him from perceiving that Robert, with all his abilities and acquirements, was no match for his cousin Francis.This seems to us the only rational explanation of the Treasurer's conduct.Mr.Montagu is more charitable.He supposes that Burleigh was influenced merely by affection for his nephew, and was "little disposed to encourage him to rely on others rather than on himself, and to venture on the quicksands of politics, instead of the certain profession of the law." If such were Burleigh's feelings, it seems strange that he should have suffered his son to venture on those quicksands from which he so carefully preserved his nephew.But the truth is that, if Burleigh had been so disposed, he might easily have secured to Bacon a comfortable provision which should have been exposed to no risk.And it is certain that he showed as little disposition to enable his nephew to live by a profession as to enable him to live without a profession.
That Bacon himself attributed the conduct of his relatives to jealousy of his superior talents, we have not the smallest doubt.
In a letter written many years later to Villiers, he expresses himself thus: "Countenance, encourage, and advance able men in all kinds, degrees, and professions.For in the time of the Cecils, the father and the son, able men were by design and of purpose suppressed."Whatever Burleigh's motives might be, his purpose was unalterable.The supplications which Francis addressed to his uncle and aunt were earnest, humble, and almost servile.He was the most promising and accomplished young man of his time.His father had been the brother-in-law, the most useful colleague, the nearest friend of the Minister.But all this availed poor Francis nothing.He was forced, much against his will, to betake himself to the study of the law.He was admitted at Gray's Inn;and during some years, he laboured there in obscurity.
What the extent of his legal attainments may have been it is difficult to say.It was not hard for a man of his powers to acquire that very moderate portion of technical knowledge which, when joined to quickness, tact, wit, ingenuity, eloquence, and knowledge of the world, is sufficient to raise an advocate to the highest professional eminence.The general opinion appears to have been that which was on one occasion expressed by Elizabeth.
"Bacon," said she, "hath a great wit and much learning; but in law showeth to the utmost of his knowledge, and is not deep." The Cecils, we suspect, did their best to spread this opinion by whispers and insinuations.Coke openly proclaimed it with that rancorous insolence which was habitual to him.No reports are more readily believed than those which disparage genius, and soothe the envy of conscious mediocrity.It must have been inexpressibly consoling to a stupid sergeant, the forerunner of him who, a hundred and fifty years later, "shook his head at Murray as a wit," to know that the most profound thinker and the most accomplished orator of the age was very imperfectly acquainted with the law touching bastard eigne and mulier puisne, and confounded the right of free fishery with that of common piscary.
It is certain that no man in that age, or indeed during the century and a half which followed, was better acquainted than Bacon with the philosophy of law.His technical knowledge was quite sufficient, with the help of his admirable talents and of his insinuating address, to procure clients.He rose very rapidly into business, and soon entertained hopes of being called within the bar.He applied to Lord Burleigh for that purpose, but received a testy refusal.Of the grounds of that refusal we can, in some measure, judge by Bacon's answer, which is still extant.
It seems that the old Lord, whose temper, age and gout had by no means altered for the better, and who loved to mark his dislike of the showy, quick-witted young men of the rising generation, took this opportunity to read Francis a very sharp lecture on his vanity and want of respect for his betters.Francis returned a most submissive reply, thanked the Treasurer for the admonition, and promised to profit by it.Strangers meanwhile were less unjust to the young barrister than his nearest kinsman had been.
