Even we, who detest paternal governments in general, shall admit that the duties of the Government of India are, to a considerable extent, paternal.There, the superiority of the governors to the governed in moral science is unquestionable.The conversion of the whole people to the worst form that Christianity ever wore in the darkest ages would be a most happy event.It is not necessary that a man should be a Christian to wish for the propagation of Christianity in India.It is sufficient that he should be an European not much below the ordinary European level of good sense and humanity.Compared with the importance of the interests at stake, all those Scotch and Irish questions which occupy so large a portion of Mr.Gladstone's book, sink into insignificance.In no part of the world since the days of Theodosius has so large a heathen population been subject to a Christian government.In no part of the world is heathenism more cruel, more licentious, more fruitful of absurd rites and pernicious laws.Surely, if it be the duty of Government to use its power and its revenue in order to bring seven millions of Irish Catholics over to the Protestant Church, it is a fortiori the duty of the Government to use its power and its revenue in order to make seventy millions of idolaters Christians.If it be a sin to suffer John Howard or William Penn to hold any office in England because they are not in communion with the Established Church, it must be a crying sin indeed to admit to high situations men who bow down, in temples covered with emblems of vice, to the hideous images of sensual or malevolent gods.
But no.Orthodoxy, it seems, is more shocked by the priests of Rome than by the priests of Kalee.The plain red brick building, the Cave of Adullam, or Ebenezer Chapel, where uneducated men hear a half-educated man talk of the Christian law of love and the Christian hope of glory, is unworthy of the indulgence which is reserved for the shrine where the Thug suspends a portion of the spoils of murdered travellers, and for the car which grinds its way through the bones of self-immolated pilgrims."It would be," says Mr.Gladstone, "an absurd exaggeration to maintain it as the part of such a Government as that of the British in India to bring home to the door of every subject at once the ministrations of a new and totally unknown religion." The Government ought indeed to desire to propagate Christianity.But the extent to which they must do so must be "limited by the degree in which the people are found willing to receive it." He proposes no such limitation in the case of Ireland.He would give the Irish a Protestant Church whether they like it or not."We believe," says he, "that that which we place before them is, whether they know it or not, calculated to be beneficial to them;and that, if they know it not now, they will know it when it is presented to them fairly.Shall we, then, purchase their applause at the expense of their substantial, nay, their spiritual interests?"And why does Mr.Gladstone allow to the Hindoo a privilege which he denies to the Irishman? Why does he reserve his greatest liberality for the most monstrous errors? Why does he pay most respect to the opinion of the least enlightened people? Why does he withhold the right to exercise paternal authority from that one Government which is fitter to exercise paternal authority than any Government that ever existed in the world? We will give the reason in his own words.
"In British India," he says, "a small number of persons advanced to a higher grade of civilisation, exercise the powers of government over an immensely greater number of less cultivated persons, not by coercion, but under free stipulation with the governed.Now, the rights of a Government, in circumstances thus peculiar, obviously depend neither upon the unrestricted theory of paternal principles, nor upon any primordial or fictitious contract of indefinite powers, but upon an express and known treaty, matter of positive agreement, not of natural ordinance."Where Mr.Gladstone has seen this treaty we cannot guess for, though he calls it a "known treaty," we will stake our credit that it is quite unknown both at Calcutta and Madras, both in Leadenhall Street and Cannon Row, that it is not to be found in any of the enormous folios of papers relating to India which fill the bookcases of members of Parliament, that it has utterly escaped the researches of all the historians of our Eastern empire, that, in the long and interesting debates of 1813 on the admission of missionaries to India, debates of which the most valuable part has been excellently preserved by the care of the speakers, no allusion to this important instrument is to be found.The truth is that this treaty is a nonentity.It is by coercion, it is by the sword, and not by free stipulation with the governed, that England rule India; nor is England bound by any contract whatever not to deal with Bengal as she deals with Ireland.She may set up a Bishop of Patna, and a Dean of Hoogley;she may grant away the public revenue for the maintenance of prebendaries of Benares and canons of Moorshedabad; she may divide the country into parishes, and place, a rector with a stipend in every one of them; and all this without infringing any positive agreement.If there be such a treaty, Mr.Gladstone can have no difficulty in ****** known its date, its terms, and, above all the precise extent of the territory within which we have sinfully bound ourselves to be guilty of practical atheism.
The last point is of great importance.For, as the provinces of our Indian empire were acquired at different times, and in very different ways, no single treaty, indeed no ten treaties, will justify the system pursued by our Government there.
