``Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie...has simplified the classantagonisms.Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.'' Then follows a history of the fall of feudalism, leading to a description of the bourgeoisie as a revolutionary force.``The bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most revolutionary part.'' ``For exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.'' ``The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the whole surface of the globe.'' ``The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together.'' Feudal relations became fetters: ``They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder....A similar movement is going on before our own eyes.'' ``The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself.But not only has the bourgoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons-- the modern working class--the proletarians.''
The cause of the destitution of the proletariat are then set forth.``The cost of production of a workman is restricted, almost entirely, to the means of subsistence that he requires for his maintenance and for the propagation of his race.But the price of a commodity, and therefore also of labor, is equal to its cost of production.In proportion, therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases.Nay more, in proportion as the use of machinery and diversion of labor increases, in the same proportion the burden of toil also increases.''
``Modern industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist.Masses of laborers, crowded into the factory, are organized like soldiers.As privates of the industrial army they are placed under the command of a perfect hierarchy of officers and sergeants.Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State, they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the over-looker, and, above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself.The more openly this despotism proclaims gain tobe its end and aim, the more petty, the more hateful, and the more embittering it is.''
The Manifesto tells next the manner of growth of the class struggle.
``The proletariat goes through various stages of development.With its birth begins its struggle with the bourgeoisie.At first the contest is carried on by individual laborers, then by the workpeople of a factory, then by the operatives of one trade, in one locality, against the individual bourgeois who directly exploits them.They direct their attacks not against the bourgeois conditions of production, but against the instruments of production themselves.''
``At this stage the laborers still form an incoherent mass scattered over the whole country, and broken up by their mutual competition.If anywhere they unite to form more compact bodies, this is not yet the consequence of their own active union, but of the union of the bourgeoisie, which class, in order to attain its own political ends, is compelled to set the whole proletariat in motion, and is moreover yet, for a time, able to do so.''
``The collisions between individual workmen and individual bourgeois take more and more the character of collisions between two classes.Thereupon the workers begin to form combinations (Trades Unions) against the bourgeois; they club together in order to keep up the rate of wages; they found permanent associations in order to make provision beforehand for these occasional revolts.Here and there the contest breaks out into riots.Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time.The real fruit of their battles lies, not in the immediate result, but in the ever-expanding union of the workers.This union is helped on by the im- proved means of communication that are created by modern industry, and that place the workers of different localities in contact with one another.It was just this contact that was needed to centralize the numerous local struggles, all of the same character, into one national struggle between classes.But every class struggle is a political struggle.And that union, to attain which the burghers of the Middle Ages, with their miserable highways, required centuries, the modern proletarians, thanks to railways, achieve in a few years.This organization of the proletarians into a class, and consequently into a political party, is continually being upset again bythe competition between the workers themselves.But it ever rises up again, stronger, firmer, mightier.It compels legislative recognition of particular interests of the workers, by taking advantage of the divisions among the bourgeoisie itself.''
