登陆注册
37836700000218

第218章 VOLUME IV(5)

Well, that is a pretty serious statement--Trumbull forges his evidence from beginning to end. Now, upon my own authority I say that it is not true. What is a forgery? Consider the evidence that Trumbull has brought forward. When you come to read the speech, as you will be able to, examine whether the evidence is a forgery from beginning to end. He had the bill or document in his hand like that [holding up a paper]. He says that is a copy of the Toomb's bill,-- the amendment offered by Toomb's. He says that is a copy of the bill as it was introduced and went into Judge Douglas's hands. Now, does Judge Douglas say that is a forgery? That is one thing Trumbull brought forward. Judge Douglas says he forged it from beginning to end! That is the "beginning," we will say. Does Douglas say that is a forgery? Let him say it to-day, and we will have a subsequent examination upon this subject. Trumbull then holds up another document like this, and says that is an exact copy of the bill as it came back in the amended form out of Judge Douglas's hands. Does Judge Douglas say that is a forgery? Does he say it in his general sweeping charge? Does he say so now? If he does not, then take this Toomb's bill and the bill in the amended form, and it only needs to compare them to see that the provision is in the one and not in the other; it leaves the inference inevitable that it was taken out.

But, while I am dealing with this question, let us see what Trumbull's other evidence is. One other piece of evidence I will read. Trumbull says there are in this original Toomb's bill these words:

"That the following propositions be and the same are hereby offered to the said Convention of the people of Kansas, when formed, for their free acceptance or rejection; which, if accepted by the Convention and ratified by the people at the election for the adoption of the constitution, shall be obligatory upon the United States and the said State of Kansas."

Now, if it is said that this is a forgery, we will open the paper here and see whether it is or not. Again, Trumbull says, as he goes along, that Mr. Bigler made the following statement in his place in the Senate, December 9, 1857:

"I was present when that subject was discussed by senators before the bill was introduced, and the question was raised and discussed, whether the constitution, when formed, should be submitted to a vote of the people. It was held by those most intelligent on the subject that, in view of all the difficulties surrounding that Territory, the danger of any experiment at that time of a popular vote, it would be better there should be no such provision in the Toomb's bill; and it was my understanding, in all the intercourse I had, that the Convention would make a constitution, and send it here, without submitting it to the popular vote."

Then Trumbull follows on:

"In speaking of this meeting again on the 21st December, 1857

[Congressional Globe, same vol., page 113], Senator Bigler said:

"'Nothing was further from my mind than to allude to any social or confidential interview. The meeting was not of that character.

Indeed, it was semi-official, and called to promote the public good.

My recollection was clear that I left the conference under the impression that it had been deemed best to adopt measures to admit Kansas as a State through the agency of one popular election, and that for delegates to this Convention. This impression was stronger because I thought the spirit of the bill infringed upon the doctrine of non-intervention, to which I had great aversion; but with the hope of accomplishing a great good, and as no movement had been made in that direction in the Territory, I waived this objection, and concluded to support the measure. I have a few items of testimony as to the correctness of these impressions, and with their submission I shall be content. I have before me the bill reported by the senator from Illinois on the 7th of March, 1856, providing for the admission of Kansas as a State, the third section of which reads as follows:

"That the following propositions be, and the same are hereby offered to the said Convention of the people of Kansas, when formed, for their free acceptance or rejection; which, if accepted by the Convention and ratified by the people at the election for the adoption of the constitution, shall be obligatory upon the United States and the said State of Kansas."

The bill read in his place by the senator from Georgia on the 25th of June, and referred to the Committee on Territories, contained the same section word for word. Both these bills were under consideration at the conference referred to; but, sir, when the senator from Illinois reported the Toombs bill to the Senate with amendments, the next morning, it did not contain that portion of the third section which indicated to the Convention that the constitution should be approved by the people. The words "and ratified by the people at the election for the adoption of the constitution" had been stricken out.'"

Now, these things Trumbull says were stated by Bigler upon the floor of the Senate on certain days, and that they are recorded in the Congressional Globe on certain pages. Does Judge Douglas say this is a forgery? Does he say there is no such thing in the Congressional Globe? What does he mean when he says Judge Trumbull forges his evidence from beginning to end? So again he says in another place that Judge Douglas, in his speech, December 9, 1857 (Congressional Globe, part I., page 15), stated:

"That during the last session of Congress, I (Mr. Douglas] reported a bill from the Committee on Territories, to authorize the people of Kansas to assemble and form a constitution for themselves.

Subsequently the senator from Georgia [Mr. Toombs] brought forward a substitute for my bill, which, after having been modified by him and myself in consultation, was passed by the Senate."

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 分开是我们最终的结局

    分开是我们最终的结局

    又名《老大,苏小姐她又去环游世界了!》我们的分开是偶然?还是必然?亦或是对人生的不同追求?苏狸是自私的她所作的所有事情的出发点都是以自己为中心的为了自己所追求的义无反顾即使遍体鳞伤也从不放弃萧祁人生一步错步步错过去的只能是成为过去式也只能用来怀念再怎么追悔都莫及两条直线的相交与平行就像是你我之间的选择交叉分离相遇重逢
  • 血凜依影

    血凜依影

    罪恶的鲜血,洗尽干净的灵魂,无眼的刀剑,刺穿无知的生灵,地狱之门为你开启,若不能通往天堂,就请堕落地狱,罪恶会满足你的野心,肮脏会覆盖你最后一丝纯洁,死神欢迎你的到来……
  • 魔龙圣子

    魔龙圣子

    一名农家少年,身负杀父之仇,同妖兽伙伴一起向大陆巅峰前进,期望为父报仇。凡阻碍者神鬼俱杀
  • 窥测天下

    窥测天下

    一个来自平行空间的神奇系统,两把万里狙杀的能量枪械。这是一个凡人的世界,也是一个创造奇迹的世界。(能够触及非凡的,不是神棍的教条,也不是冰冷的科技,而是潜藏在人心深处的良知——张小野)
  • 扬清集

    扬清集

    本书为杂文、杂感集,书中许多文章为作者对一些事情所发表了的一些感慨,例如《爱书还是加负》《请放过李咏一马列》等,本书语言流畅、情感真挚。
  • 重生之羽翼飞凡

    重生之羽翼飞凡

    她,来自地狱的恶魔,六界里面最大的魔,你如果惹到了她,下一秒便会生不如死。她长得风华绝代,小心!这是一个美丽的陷阱!她遭受了最痛苦的打击,被自己的闺蜜打死!她虽然是魔,但却无力还手。她发誓,三百年后,必将回来复仇。哪知,竟穿越到了自己后代的身上。她在人间成为著名特工后,竟又不小心穿越回去了?而且,是自己那个时代的异世大陆?天?我的天啊!竟然有穿越回去了?没事,姐姐天赋极高,继续修炼1在她修炼成功之时,就是她的闺蜜遭殃之日!本书感谢墨星免费小说封面支持,百度搜索“墨星封面”第一个就是!
  • 月未央:江山美人决

    月未央:江山美人决

    他静静的望着窗外的浅月,唇角露出一抹伤感的笑。手里慢慢地握紧了那枚月牙玉佩,浅月浅月……屋外铁缻下已经燃起大火。他缓缓脱掉所有衣裳,自甘入缻。为了你,我……无悔。--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 变异的战士

    变异的战士

    茫茫宇宙,地球只是其中一颗渺小的小行星,宇宙中有无数这样的小行星。公元2909年,地球迎来了第一个来自外太空的人类――外星人!他们科技发达,知识丰富,相比之下,地球人类的科技和知识远远不能对抗。面对强势降临的外星人,地球人类能守护好他们的家园吗?是胜利?还是失败灭亡?这一切都在杨天瑞的身上,作为地球上唯一的一名变异人类,他能否带领地球人类渡过这次危机?(修改中)
  • 只要你也喜欢我

    只要你也喜欢我

    高二级花姚小记的“双重性格”,使得骂名不少,校草却单单独宠于她……故事还长,余生难忘,请你多多指教。
  • 丑女当自强

    丑女当自强

    想她柳飞花堂堂一个武术冠军,路见不平,拔刀相插。无奈这年头好人难做。为救人性命,自己丢了性命不说,这天杀的老天爷竟然叫她穿越,穿就穿了,好歹小命还在。可是,这是什么情况!!魂穿不说,这身子的主人怎么这么胖,这么丑,还白目?不行,绝对不能让人给看扁了,且看她如何翻身,丑女当自强!