I -THE SATIRIST
MY companion enjoyed a cheap reputation for wit and insight.
He was by habit and repute a satirist.If he did occasionally condemn anything or anybody who richly deserved it,and whose demerits had hitherto escaped,it was simply because he condemned everything and everybody.While I was with him he disposed of St.Paul with an epigram,shook my reverence for Shakespeare in a neat antithesis,and fell foul of the Almighty Himself,on the score of one or two out of the ten commandments.Nothing escaped his blighting censure.
At every sentence he overthrew an idol,or lowered my estimation of a friend.I saw everything with new eyes,and could only marvel at my former blindness.How was it possible that I had not before observed A's false hair,B's selfishness,or C's boorish manners?I and my companion,methought,walked the streets like a couple of gods among a swarm of vermin;for every one we saw seemed to bear openly upon his brow the mark of the apocalyptic beast.I half expected that these miserable beings,like the people of Lystra,would recognise their betters and force us to the altar;in which case,warned by the late of Paul and Barnabas,I do not know that my modesty would have prevailed upon me to decline.But there was no need for such churlish virtue.More blinded than the Lycaonians,the people saw no divinity in our gait;and as our temporary godhead lay more in the way of observing than healing their infirmities,we were content to pass them by in scorn.
I could not leave my companion,not from regard or even from interest,but from a very natural feeling,inseparable from the case.To understand it,let us take a simile.Suppose yourself walking down the street with a man who continues to sprinkle the crowd out of a flask of vitriol.You would be much diverted with the grimaces and contortions of his victims;and at the same time you would fear to leave his arm until his bottle was empty,knowing that,when once among the crowd,you would run a good chance yourself of baptism with his biting liquor.Now my companion's vitriol was inexhaustible.
It was perhaps the consciousness of this,the knowledge that I was being anointed already out of the vials of his wrath,that made me fall to criticising the critic,whenever we had parted.
After all,I thought,our satirist has just gone far enough into his neighbours to find that the outside is false,without caring to go farther and discover what is really true.He is content to find that things are not what they seem,and broadly generalises from it that they do not exist at all.He sees our virtues are not what they pretend they are;and,on the strength of that,he denies us the possession of virtue altogether.He has learnt the first lesson,that no man is wholly good;but he has not even suspected that there is another equally true,to wit,that no man is wholly bad.Like the inmate of a coloured star,he has eyes for one colour alone.He has a keen scent after evil,but his nostrils are plugged against all good,as people plugged their nostrils before going about the streets of the plague-struck city.
Why does he do this?It is most unreasonable to flee the knowledge of good like the infection of a horrible disease,and batten and grow fat in the real atmosphere of a lazar-house.This was my first thought;but my second was not like unto it,and I saw that our satirist was wise,wise in his generation,like the unjust steward.He does not want light,because the darkness is more pleasant.He does not wish to see the good,because he is happier without it.I recollect that when I walked with him,I was in a state of divine exaltation,such as Adam and Eve must have enjoyed when the savour of the fruit was still unfaded between their lips;and I recognise that this must be the man's habitual state.He has the forbidden fruit in his waist-coat pocket,and can make himself a god as often and as long as he likes.He has raised himself upon a glorious pedestal above his fellows;he has touched the summit of ambition;and he envies neither King nor Kaiser,Prophet nor Priest,content in an elevation as high as theirs,and much more easily attained.Yes,certes,much more easily attained.He has not risen by climbing himself,but by pushing others down.He has grown great in his own estimation,not by blowing himself out,and risking the fate of AEsop's frog,but simply by the habitual use of a diminishing glass on everybody else.And I think altogether that his is a better,a safer,and a surer recipe than most others.
After all,however,looking back on what I have written,Idetect a spirit suspiciously like his own.All through,Ihave been comparing myself with our satirist,and all through,I have had the best of the comparison.Well,well,contagion is as often mental as physical;and I do not think my readers,who have all been under his lash,will blame me very much for giving the headsman a mouthful of his own sawdust.
II -NUITS BLANCHES
IF any one should know the pleasure and pain of a sleepless night,it should be I.I remember,so long ago,the sickly child that woke from his few hours'slumber with the sweat of a nightmare on his brow,to lie awake and listen and long for the first signs of life among the silent streets.These nights of pain and weariness are graven on my mind;and so when the same thing happened to me again,everything that Iheard or saw was rather a recollection than a discovery.
Weighed upon by the opaque and almost sensible darkness,Ilistened eagerly for anything to break the sepulchral quiet.
