C.'Of Damien I begin to have an idea.He seems to have been a man of the peasant class,certainly of the peasant type:shrewd,ignorant and bigoted,yet with an open mind,and capable of receiving and digesting a reproof if it were bluntly administered;superbly generous in the least thing as well as in the greatest,and as ready to give his last shirt (although not without human grumbling)as he had been to sacrifice his life;essentially indiscreet and officious,which made him a troublesome colleague;domineering in all his ways,which made him incurably unpopular with the Kanakas,but yet destitute of real authority,so that his boys laughed at him and he must carry out his wishes by the means of bribes.He learned to have a mania for doctoring;and set up the Kanakas against the remedies of his regular rivals:perhaps (if anything matter at all in the treatment of such a disease)the worst thing that he did,and certainly the easiest.The best and worst of the man appear very plainly in his dealings with Mr.Chapman's money;he had originally laid it out'[intended to lay it out]'entirely for the benefit of Catholics,and even so not wisely;but after a long,plain talk,he admitted his error fully and revised the list.The sad state of the boys'home is in part the result of his lack of control;in part,of his own slovenly ways and false ideas of hygiene.Brother officials used to call it "Damien's Chinatown.""Well,"they would say,"your China-town keeps growing."And he would laugh with perfect good-nature,and adhere to his errors with perfect obstinacy.So much I have gathered of truth about this plain,noble human brother and father of ours;his imperfections are the traits of his face,by which we know him for our fellow;his martyrdom and his example nothing can lessen or annul;and only a person here on the spot can properly appreciate their greatness.'
I have set down these private passages,as you perceive,without correction;thanks to you,the public has them in their bluntness.They are almost a list of the man's faults,for it is rather these that I was seeking:with his virtues,with the heroic profile of his life,I and the world were already sufficiently acquainted.I was besides a little suspicious of Catholic testimony;in no ill sense,but merely because Damien's admirers and disciples were the least likely to be critical.I know you will be more suspicious still;and the facts set down above were one and all collected from the lips of Protestants who had opposed the father in his life.Yet I am strangely deceived,or they build up the image of a man,with all his weaknesses,essentially heroic,and alive with rugged honesty,generosity,and mirth.
Take it for what it is,rough private jottings of the worst sides of Damien's character,collected from the lips of those who had laboured with and (in your own phrase)'knew the man';-though I question whether Damien would have said that he knew you.Take it,and observe with wonder how well you were served by your gossips,how ill by your intelligence and sympathy;in how many points of fact we are at one,and how widely our appreciations vary.There is something wrong here;either with you or me.It is possible,for instance,that you,who seem to have so many ears in Kalawao,had heard of the affair of Mr.Chapman's money,and were singly struck by Damien's intended wrong-doing.I was struck with that also,and set it fairly down;but I was struck much more by the fact that he had the honesty of mind to be convinced.Imay here tell you that it was a long business;that one of his colleagues sat with him late into the night,multiplying arguments and accusations;that the father listened as usual with 'perfect good-nature and perfect obstinacy';but at the last,when he was persuaded -'Yes,'said he,'I am very much obliged to you;you have done me a service;it would have been a theft.'There are many (not Catholics merely)who require their heroes and saints to be infallible;to these the story will be painful;not to the true lovers,patrons,and servants of mankind.
And I take it,this is a type of our division;that you are one of those who have an eye for faults and failures;that you take a pleasure to find and publish them;and that,having found them,you make haste to forget the overvailing virtues and the real success which had alone introduced them to your knowledge.It is a dangerous frame of mind.That you may understand how dangerous,and into what a situation it has already brought you,we will (if you please)go hand-in-hand through the different phrases of your letter,and candidly examine each from the point of view of its truth,its appositeness,and its charity.
Damien was COARSE.
It is very possible.You make us sorry for the lepers,who had only a coarse old peasant for their friend and father.
But you,who were so refined,why were you not there,to cheer them with the lights of culture?Or may I remind you that we have some reason to doubt if John the Baptist were genteel;and in the case of Peter,on whose career you doubtless dwell approvingly in the pulpit,no doubt at all he was a 'coarse,headstrong'fisherman!Yet even in our Protestant Bibles Peter is called Saint.
Damien was DIRTY.
He was.Think of the poor lepers annoyed with this dirty comrade!But the clean Dr.Hyde was at his food in a fine house.
Damien was HEADSTRONG.
I believe you are right again;and I thank God for his strong head and heart.
Damien was BIGOTED.
