Of that oratory, something must now be said.By it he rose to fame and power, as, indeed, by it most English statesmen have risen, save those to whom wealth and rank and family connections have given a sort of presumptive claim to high office, like the Cavendishes and the Russells, the Cecils and the Bentincks.And for many years, during which Mr.Gladstone was distrusted as a statesman because, while he had ceased to be a Tory, he had not fully become a Liberal, his eloquence was the main, one might almost say the sole, source of his influence.Oratory was a power in English politics even a century and a half ago, as the career of the elder Pitt shows.But within the last fifty years, years which have seen the power of rank and family connections decline, it has continued to be essential to the highest success although much less cultivated as a fine art, and brings a man quickly to the front, though it will not keep him there should he prove to want the other branches of statesmanlike capacity.
The permanent reputation of an orator depends upon two things, the witness of contemporaries to the impression produced upon them, and the written or printed--we may, perhaps, be soon able to say the phonographed--record of his speeches.Few are the famous speakers who would be famous if they were tried by this latter test alone, and Mr.Gladstone was not one of them.It is only by a rare combination of gifts that one who speaks with so much readiness, force, and brilliance as to charm his listeners is also able to deliver such valuable thoughts in such choice words that posterity will read them as literature.Some few of the ancient orators did this; but we seldom know how far those of their speeches which have been preserved are the speeches which they actually delivered.
Among moderns, some French preachers, Edmund Burke, Macaulay, and Daniel Webster are perhaps the only speakers whose discourses have passed into classics and find new generations of readers.Twenty years hence Mr.Gladstone's will not be read, except, of course, by historians.They are too long, too diffuse, too minute in their handling of details, too elaborately qualified in their enunciation of general principles.They contain few epigrams and few of those weighty thoughts put into telling phrases which the Greeks called [Greek text].
The style, in short, is not sufficiently rich or finished to give a perpetual interest to matters whose practical importance has vanished.The same oblivion has overtaken all but a very few of the best things of Grattan, Pitt, Canning, Plunket, Brougham, Peel, Bright.It may, indeed, be said--and the examples of Burke and Macaulay show that this is no paradox--that the speakers whom posterity most enjoys are rarely those who most affected the audiences that listened to them.
If, on the other hand, Mr.Gladstone be judged by the impression he made on his own time, his place will be high in the front rank.His speeches were neither so concisely telling as Mr.Bright's nor so finished in diction; but no other man among his contemporaries--neither Lord Derby nor Mr.Lowe nor Mr.Disraeli nor Bishop Wilberforce nor Bishop Magee--deserved comparison with him.And he rose superior to Mr.Bright himself in readiness, in variety of knowledge, in persuasive ingenuity.Mr.Bright required time for preparation, and was always more successful in alarming his adversaries and stimulating his friends than in either instructing or convincing anybody.Mr.Gladstone could do all these four things, and could do them at an hour's notice, so vast and well ordered was the arsenal of his mind.
His oratory had many conspicuous merits.There was a lively imagination, which enabled him to relieve even dull matter by pleasing figures, together with a large command of quotations and illustrations.There were remarkable powers of sarca**--powers, however, which he rarely used, preferring the summer lightning of banter to the thunderbolt of invective.There was admirable lucidity and accuracy in exposition.There was great skill in the disposition and marshaling of his arguments, and finally--a gift now almost lost in England--there was a wonderful variety and grace of appropriate gesture.But above and beyond everything else which enthralled the listener, there were four qualities, two specially conspicuous in the substance of his eloquence--inventiveness and elevation; two not less remarkable in his manner--force in the delivery, expressive modulation in the voice.
