If it happened that you didn't either--which was rare, yet might be--of course there were cross-purposes; but Brooksmith was there to prevent their going very far.This was precisely the way he acted as moderator; he averted misunderstandings or cleared them up.He had been capable, strange as it may appear, of acquiring for this purpose an insight into the French tongue, which was often used at Mr.Offord's; for besides being habitual to most of the foreigners, and they were many, who haunted the place or arrived with letters--letters often requiring a little worried consideration, of which Brooksmith always had cognisance--it had really become the primary language of the master of the house.Idon't know if all the malentendus were in French, but almost all the explanations were, and this didn't a bit prevent Brooksmith's following them.I know Mr.Offord used to read passages to him from Montaigne and Saint-Simon, for he read perpetually when alone--when THEY were alone, that is--and Brooksmith was always about.
Perhaps you'll say no wonder Mr.Offord's butler regarded him as "rather mad." However, if I'm not sure what he thought about Montaigne I'm convinced he admired Saint-Simon.A certain feeling for letters must have rubbed off on him from the mere handling of his master's books, which he was always carrying to and fro and putting back in their places.
I often noticed that if an anecdote or a quotation, much more a lively discussion, was going forward, he would, if busy with the fire or the curtains, the lamp or the tea, find a pretext for remaining in the room till the point should be reached.If his purpose was to catch it you weren't discreet, you were in fact scarce human, to call him off, and I shall never forget a look, a hard stony stare--I caught it in its passage--which, one day when there were a good many people in the room, he fastened upon the footman who was helping him in the service and who, in an undertone, had asked him some irrelevant question.It was the only manifestation of harshness I ever observed on Brooksmith's part, and I at first wondered what was the matter.Then I became conscious that Mr.Offord was relating a very curious anecdote, never before perhaps made so public, and imparted to the narrator by an eye-witness of the fact, bearing on Lord Byron's life in Italy.Nothing would induce me to reproduce it here, but Brooksmith had been in danger of losing it.If I ever should venture to reproduce it I shall feel how much I lose in not having my fellow auditor to refer to.
The first day Mr Offord's door was closed was therefore a dark date in contemporary history.It was raining hard and my umbrella was wet, but Brooksmith received it from me exactly as if this were a preliminary for going upstairs.I observed however that instead of putting it away he held it poised and trickling over the rug, and Ithen became aware that he was looking at me with deep acknowledging eyes--his air of universal responsibility.I immediately understood--there was scarce need of question and answer as they passed between us.When I took in that our good friend had given up as never before, though only for the occasion, I exclaimed dolefully: "What a difference it will make--and to how many people!""I shall be one of them, sir!" said Brooksmith; and that was the beginning of the end.
Mr.Offord came down again, but the spell was broken, the great sign being that the conversation was for the first time not directed.It wandered and stumbled, a little frightened, like a lost child--it had let go the nurse's hand."The worst of it is that now we shall talk about my health--c'est la fin de tout," Mr.
Offord said when he reappeared; and then I recognised what a note of change that would be--for he had never tolerated anything so provincial.We "ran" to each other's health as little as to the daily weather.The talk became ours, in a word--not his; and as ours, even when HE talked, it could only be inferior.In this form it was a distress to Brooksmith, whose attention now wandered from it altogether: he had so much closer a vision of his master's intimate conditions than our superficialities represented.There were better hours, and he was more in and out of the room, but Icould see he was conscious of the decline, almost of the collapse, of our great institution.He seemed to wish to take counsel with me about it, to feel responsible for its going on in some form or other.When for the second period--the first had lasted several days--he had to tell me that his employer didn't receive, I half expected to hear him say after a moment "Do you think I ought to, sir, in his place?"--as he might have asked me, with the return of autumn, if I thought he had better light the drawing-room fire.
He had a resigned philosophic sense of what his guests--our guests, as I came to regard them in our colloquies--would expect.His feeling was that he wouldn't absolutely have approved of himself as a substitute for Mr.Offord; but he was so saturated with the religion of habit that he would have made, for our friends, the necessary sacrifice to the divinity.He would take them on a little further and till they could look about them.I think I saw him also mentally confronted with the opportunity to deal--for once in his life--with some of his own dumb preferences, his limitations of sympathy, WEEDING a little in prospect and returning to a purer tradition.It was not unknown to me that he considered that toward the end of our host's career a certain laxity of selection had crept in.
